The University of British Columbia
UBC - A Place of Mind
The University of British Columbia Vancouver campus
ETEC 522 – Ventures in Learning Technologies
  • Startup
    • How to Begin?
    • Objectives
    • Course Manual
    • Outline & Schedule
    • Participation Guide
    • Assignments
    • ☛ Introduce Yourself!
    • 👥 Authors
  • W01: Emerging Markets
    • W01: Emerging Market Teams
  • W02-04: Bootcamp
    • Global Dynamics
    • Who is the Customer?
    • What is a Venture?
    • 👥 Opportunity Horizon
    • W03: Analyst Bootcamp
    • A Game with Three Pitches
    • Deconstructing a Pitch
    • 👥 Pitch Critique
    • W04: Entrepreneur Bootcamp
    • Venture Genesis
    • Opportunity Activation
    • The Right Stuff
    • 👥 Founders Parade
  • W05-12: Opportunity Forecasts
    • W05: Personalized Learning
    • W06: Mobile Learning
    • W07: Game-Based Learning
    • W08: Big Data & Learning Analytics
    • W09: Immersive Experience
    • W10: Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning
    • W11: Microlearning
    • W12: Wearables
  • W13: Launch
    • Venture Forum Resources
  • Forums
    • W01 – Emerging Markets
    • W02 – Market Projections
    • W03 – Pitch Pool
    • W04 – Founders Parade
    • W05-12 – Opportunity Forecasts (A2)
    • W13 – Venture Forum (A3)
    • Analyst Reports (A1)
  • Global Feeds
    • Announcements
    • Eva’s Café
    • Radio 522
  • LOGIN
Sort By
Show only these categories:
Show only this category:

Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

By Bryan Thompson on November 27, 2016

Hi Everyone,logo

Below you’ll find both my elevator and venture pitch for a new reading app called Symposium. It’s pitched to Educational Venture Analysts who have connections with professors and universities.

This project grew out of my desire to teach critical reading strategies to my students online. Having students read independently and properly engage with texts can be tricky. So it’s been a challenge for me that better apps could help me with. I’ve tried VoiceThread but it doesn’t have quite the right functionality and Google Drive isn’t great for more complex texts that I want to keep static. Symposium grew out of my needs.

Elevator Pitch

YouTube Preview Image

 

Venture Pitch

YouTube Preview Image

 

I hope you find it interesting and you could even see using.

I would greatly appreciate any feedback and I look forward to watching everyone else’s pitches.

Bryan

 


Symposium Logo is from Shutterstock.
All slide icons are from Flaticon.
Rating
Average: 3.1/5 Stars
 
 
 
 
 
0 Thumbs Up!

Read More | No Comments

Loading...
4 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Hi Bryan, Great elevator/venture pitch. I think they were both clear and concise. I would have liked to see some of the charts/graphics in the venture pitch full screen. I do think that you identified a pain point, I always hated reading 20+ page journal articles in university. They often were boring and sometimes impossible to understand. I think creating a software that actively engages learners with the readings could be very successful. It would also be helpful for instructors to known where the struggles are prior to class. I also like that it has the option for peer interaction. With that said I am not sure student will want to use the software. It has a bit of a big brother effect and if I didn't complete my readings or just did them before class I wouldn't want my instructor to know. I also think it might be challenging to get teachers off of platform the institution already subscribes to. I would consider investing in this product but would wait for proof of concept first.

4 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
Colleen Huck @cmhuck

Hi Bryan, Great elevator/venture pitch. I think they were both clear and concise. I would have liked to see some of the charts/graphics in the venture pitch full screen. I do think that you identified a pain point, I always hated reading 20+ page journal articles in university. They often were boring and sometimes impossible to understand. I think creating a software that actively engages learners with the readings could be very successful. It would also be helpful for instructors to known where the struggles are prior to class. I also like that it has the option for peer interaction. With that said I am not sure student will want to use the software. It has a bit of a big brother effect and if I didn't complete my readings or just did them before class I wouldn't want my instructor to know. I also think it might be challenging to get teachers off of platform the institution already subscribes to. I would consider investing in this product but would wait for proof of concept first.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
4 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Hi Bryan, thanks for your pitch! I like your enthusiasm in your venture pitch. I really like the idea of this program but am not sure it is entirely practical or that many prof's would implement this. I think moving to a blended format where students complete the readings and are offered opportunity for discussion before coming to class might work best. I am not entirely writing off the idea yet as I do think it is unique and would like to use it first. If this worked well with current LMS platforms then I would consider investing. A sort of "add on" to already existing courses. Thanks for sharing the idea! Would love to see it live.

4 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
bhanson @bhanson

Hi Bryan, thanks for your pitch! I like your enthusiasm in your venture pitch. I really like the idea of this program but am not sure it is entirely practical or that many prof's would implement this. I think moving to a blended format where students complete the readings and are offered opportunity for discussion before coming to class might work best. I am not entirely writing off the idea yet as I do think it is unique and would like to use it first. If this worked well with current LMS platforms then I would consider investing. A sort of "add on" to already existing courses. Thanks for sharing the idea! Would love to see it live.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
4 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Feedback: Interesting idea. But I wouldn't invest in this venture at the moment because I think this venture sounds more like something that can be used AFTER completing the readings instead of using it DURING or BEFORE as a reading platform substitute to engage reading. I can see instructors try this for a while, but then ultimately find it to be not that useful as this would require more input from the instructors and peers for each reading that can't be easily controlled. Suggestions: If Symposium allows instructors to open and close a required reading session, then I suppose the idea could work because then students and instructors won't have to wait constantly for an update or discussion to start without a clear date. So adding a timeframe feature might be useful, but then be sure to have it as read-only after so that students can continue to view the content, though comments can't be added. Just a thought. Great pitch though.

4 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
Wanyi Wong @wanyiw85

Feedback: Interesting idea. But I wouldn't invest in this venture at the moment because I think this venture sounds more like something that can be used AFTER completing the readings instead of using it DURING or BEFORE as a reading platform substitute to engage reading. I can see instructors try this for a while, but then ultimately find it to be not that useful as this would require more input from the instructors and peers for each reading that can't be easily controlled. Suggestions: If Symposium allows instructors to open and close a required reading session, then I suppose the idea could work because then students and instructors won't have to wait constantly for an update or discussion to start without a clear date. So adding a timeframe feature might be useful, but then be sure to have it as read-only after so that students can continue to view the content, though comments can't be added. Just a thought. Great pitch though.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
4 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Hi Bryan, I think both of your pitches are great: well-prepared, organized and presented! I enjoyed watching them very much: you are a very engaging, confident presenter and a wonderful storyteller! You also ask questions and use facial expressions effectively. You clearly identified a problem and presented a solution. I like that Symposium allows independent reading and reading with the classmates, thus students can choose the mode they prefer. Your elevator pitch communicates well your "value proposition". I think your Symposium is an original idea, and I like your vision on how you will be developing/expanding it through different phases. However, I would not invest in it, as I do not feel I would be able to contribute to its success. Good luck with bringing it to life!

4 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
Galina Culpechina @gculpech

Hi Bryan, I think both of your pitches are great: well-prepared, organized and presented! I enjoyed watching them very much: you are a very engaging, confident presenter and a wonderful storyteller! You also ask questions and use facial expressions effectively. You clearly identified a problem and presented a solution. I like that Symposium allows independent reading and reading with the classmates, thus students can choose the mode they prefer. Your elevator pitch communicates well your "value proposition". I think your Symposium is an original idea, and I like your vision on how you will be developing/expanding it through different phases. However, I would not invest in it, as I do not feel I would be able to contribute to its success. Good luck with bringing it to life!

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
3 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Hi Bryan, your pitches were well-prepared and it was good that you focused on a problem you personally found, which means that other teachers are probably also experiencing the same. It is an interesting idea and I agree with your thoughts and research about collaborative reading, however, I wouldn't invest it in due to the legal issues of needing to link or upload articles into your program to share. In order to verify the article, you will need to work with each institutions library system and have access to their SSO. It might be better to market this tool to the software companies, like ProQuest, who service the Journals and libraries as a way they could enhance their product rather than to teachers or institutions. I do know that eTextbook distributors, like Vital Source, are looking to add this feature to their product. They already have note-taking and highlighting (both public and private) included in their platform. I really like the idea of the conversation happening directly in the article without a separate discussion board, I'm just not sure about the feasibility of the product.

3 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
Sarah @sarahkw

Hi Bryan, your pitches were well-prepared and it was good that you focused on a problem you personally found, which means that other teachers are probably also experiencing the same. It is an interesting idea and I agree with your thoughts and research about collaborative reading, however, I wouldn't invest it in due to the legal issues of needing to link or upload articles into your program to share. In order to verify the article, you will need to work with each institutions library system and have access to their SSO. It might be better to market this tool to the software companies, like ProQuest, who service the Journals and libraries as a way they could enhance their product rather than to teachers or institutions. I do know that eTextbook distributors, like Vital Source, are looking to add this feature to their product. They already have note-taking and highlighting (both public and private) included in their platform. I really like the idea of the conversation happening directly in the article without a separate discussion board, I'm just not sure about the feasibility of the product.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
2 Dec Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

REVIEW

I would not invest in the product at this time, however I do find the idea intriguing. The idea of a peer-driven, collaborative discussion tool for encouraging academic reading in higher education is fantastic. Allowing professors to highlight specific sections and embed questions, comments or discussion parameters within the text is also a great idea. Suggestion: you might also allow professors to embed video or audio to turn that article into a blended delivery lesson, using shorter video clips to address specific sections within a larger article.


There are a few specific concerns and questions that I have for the product at this time, and I don’t feel you have answered those issues enough for me to invest at this time.


First of all, I would like more explanation on how the analytics work. How will this be collected, what kind of information, and how can it be used to target learning objectives?


Secondly, I do not think your ask of $500,000 is enough to carry your business through to profitability. You have a large staff (it appears to be about 20) and you will need to float the business for 18-24 months. I am not sure that you will have the legs to get there on a $500, 000 investment.


Next, I am quite concerned that you have not clearly addressed the issue of getting access rights to the journal articles. There are many platforms that deliver/manage/control and profit from the control of information from academic journals. How will you fit content from vendor-curators like Wiley Online Library and JSTOR, for example, into your platform? Won’t your customers (schools and professors) have to pay an additional content license to use these materials in your product? There may be restrictions in use from these vendors, as you are essentially republishing (or presenting) their content in a for-profit 3rd party application. Many of these vendors make it difficult to students download or use their PDFs, even for institutions that have licenses with them to do so. I suspect that this will be a substantial hurdle to overcome. In addition, it seems as if there is little coordination between content curators at this time (there seems to be no standardization of presentation, delivery, or even archival and searching) and this might mean negotiations will need to be conducted with each vendor of content.


Finally, the big weakness: your revenue model. I have many issues with the idea of a new classroom tool that forces students to bear the cost of implementation. It might be the quickest way to reach a large market, but it means that students will be forced to buy a product that also requires a computer and Internet access. I know that most students these days do own connected devices, but I am not sure that it can be made a mandatory part of education (but then, it is a long time since I have been a student at a Canadian university). I suspect that there will be resistance from students. In addition, I suspect that you will meet with resistance from administrators or even faculty at the idea of making this a mandatory purchase for students.


If it isn’t mandatory, then I wonder at the longevity of the product. If students do not NEED it, then many will not BUY it. If this trend continues, how long will it be used by professors? Students often take the path of least resistance, and not buying a tool that makes them do more work seems like a “path of least resistance” to me.


It might be better to examine a revenue model where this is integrated into the suite of products used by a school for their students. You might do better to target professors or institutions to implement your product. Institutions of higher education have budgets available for products such as this. It takes longer for you to expand into your market, but it seems like a more reliable revenue model in the end.


Finally, there is a legal consideration. As soon as your product starts hosting comments by students, you have to deal with security of their identities. This is why I wonder if this might not be better to develop this as a plugin for some of the more popular LMS products on the market. Access to your plugin would sit behind the universities login and would shield you from some of the legal issues that might make this problematic for larger scale deployment. I do not have experience in 3rd party for-profit plugins, however, but I suggest that it might be worth considering.

2 Dec
0 Thumbs Up!
Craig @cam222

REVIEW

I would not invest in the product at this time, however I do find the idea intriguing. The idea of a peer-driven, collaborative discussion tool for encouraging academic reading in higher education is fantastic. Allowing professors to highlight specific sections and embed questions, comments or discussion parameters within the text is also a great idea. Suggestion: you might also allow professors to embed video or audio to turn that article into a blended delivery lesson, using shorter video clips to address specific sections within a larger article.


There are a few specific concerns and questions that I have for the product at this time, and I don’t feel you have answered those issues enough for me to invest at this time.


First of all, I would like more explanation on how the analytics work. How will this be collected, what kind of information, and how can it be used to target learning objectives?


Secondly, I do not think your ask of $500,000 is enough to carry your business through to profitability. You have a large staff (it appears to be about 20) and you will need to float the business for 18-24 months. I am not sure that you will have the legs to get there on a $500, 000 investment.


Next, I am quite concerned that you have not clearly addressed the issue of getting access rights to the journal articles. There are many platforms that deliver/manage/control and profit from the control of information from academic journals. How will you fit content from vendor-curators like Wiley Online Library and JSTOR, for example, into your platform? Won’t your customers (schools and professors) have to pay an additional content license to use these materials in your product? There may be restrictions in use from these vendors, as you are essentially republishing (or presenting) their content in a for-profit 3rd party application. Many of these vendors make it difficult to students download or use their PDFs, even for institutions that have licenses with them to do so. I suspect that this will be a substantial hurdle to overcome. In addition, it seems as if there is little coordination between content curators at this time (there seems to be no standardization of presentation, delivery, or even archival and searching) and this might mean negotiations will need to be conducted with each vendor of content.


Finally, the big weakness: your revenue model. I have many issues with the idea of a new classroom tool that forces students to bear the cost of implementation. It might be the quickest way to reach a large market, but it means that students will be forced to buy a product that also requires a computer and Internet access. I know that most students these days do own connected devices, but I am not sure that it can be made a mandatory part of education (but then, it is a long time since I have been a student at a Canadian university). I suspect that there will be resistance from students. In addition, I suspect that you will meet with resistance from administrators or even faculty at the idea of making this a mandatory purchase for students.


If it isn’t mandatory, then I wonder at the longevity of the product. If students do not NEED it, then many will not BUY it. If this trend continues, how long will it be used by professors? Students often take the path of least resistance, and not buying a tool that makes them do more work seems like a “path of least resistance” to me.


It might be better to examine a revenue model where this is integrated into the suite of products used by a school for their students. You might do better to target professors or institutions to implement your product. Institutions of higher education have budgets available for products such as this. It takes longer for you to expand into your market, but it seems like a more reliable revenue model in the end.


Finally, there is a legal consideration. As soon as your product starts hosting comments by students, you have to deal with security of their identities. This is why I wonder if this might not be better to develop this as a plugin for some of the more popular LMS products on the market. Access to your plugin would sit behind the universities login and would shield you from some of the legal issues that might make this problematic for larger scale deployment. I do not have experience in 3rd party for-profit plugins, however, but I suggest that it might be worth considering.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
30 Nov Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

Hi Bryan, your pitch is well thought out and put together. However,as an EVA, I would not invest in this pitch. I have always highly valued the experience of in-class discussion and this product takes away from it by discussing topics beforehand. There's something to be said about the spontaneity of in-class discussions, of considering an opposing opinion and thinking on your feet to defend your position or to change your mind as the class discussion evolves. If Symposium already has discussions embedded in the text, it may render the classroom discussions redundant which may decrease the learning experience in the classroom. However, I do think that Symposium can be a very valuable product for strictly online courses where discussions are not as prevalent and can be used to discuss text in detail. I very much like the private mode idea of being able to annotate besides the article, but I am curious on the responsive layout of this. Given the minimal space on a mobile screen, how would Symposium accommodate both the text and the comments on the same screen? If not on the same screen, how would this impact the experience?

30 Nov
0 Thumbs Up!
Joyce Chan @jhlchan

Hi Bryan, your pitch is well thought out and put together. However,as an EVA, I would not invest in this pitch. I have always highly valued the experience of in-class discussion and this product takes away from it by discussing topics beforehand. There's something to be said about the spontaneity of in-class discussions, of considering an opposing opinion and thinking on your feet to defend your position or to change your mind as the class discussion evolves. If Symposium already has discussions embedded in the text, it may render the classroom discussions redundant which may decrease the learning experience in the classroom. However, I do think that Symposium can be a very valuable product for strictly online courses where discussions are not as prevalent and can be used to discuss text in detail. I very much like the private mode idea of being able to annotate besides the article, but I am curious on the responsive layout of this. Given the minimal space on a mobile screen, how would Symposium accommodate both the text and the comments on the same screen? If not on the same screen, how would this impact the experience?

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
29 Nov Posted on Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App

No. I would not invest in Symposium. As a teacher, I love the idea. The desire to increase student engagement is always in the forefront of my mind. After 12 years in the classroom, I know it is a complex interplay of the culture/relationships created in each class and the systems put in place by the teacher. I think Symposium is a wonderful platform, but the cynical side of me thinks it would turn into another version of the online discussion boards we see in online classes, where most of the content is generated by students that feel obliged to post something, rather than the insights of engaged students posting of their own interest. One of the strongest aspects of this venture is the marketing plan. The model where professors - who have strong influence over a large number of students - get free use and the cost is borne by the student is very intriguing...it is a new way to leverage teacher influence, which historically has been centered around textbooks, with publishers lobbying profs to choose their content. As online content becomes more prevalent and the old paradigm decays, there is an opportunity for new ventures to step into that space.

29 Nov
0 Thumbs Up!
Joshua Elsdon @jelsdon

No. I would not invest in Symposium. As a teacher, I love the idea. The desire to increase student engagement is always in the forefront of my mind. After 12 years in the classroom, I know it is a complex interplay of the culture/relationships created in each class and the systems put in place by the teacher. I think Symposium is a wonderful platform, but the cynical side of me thinks it would turn into another version of the online discussion boards we see in online classes, where most of the content is generated by students that feel obliged to post something, rather than the insights of engaged students posting of their own interest. One of the strongest aspects of this venture is the marketing plan. The model where professors - who have strong influence over a large number of students - get free use and the cost is borne by the student is very intriguing...it is a new way to leverage teacher influence, which historically has been centered around textbooks, with publishers lobbying profs to choose their content. As online content becomes more prevalent and the old paradigm decays, there is an opportunity for new ventures to step into that space.

  • Expand
  • 0 Replies
  • in reply to Assignment 3 – Symposium Social Reading App
  • Loading...
  • Previous
  • Next
Show only this category:
How to Begin

Custom Search

Tags

2014 2015 2016

Faculty of Education
Vancouver Campus
2125 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
Website pdce.educ.ubc.ca/
Email pdce.educ@ubc.ca
Back to top
The University of British Columbia
  • Emergency Procedures |
  • Terms of Use |
  • Copyright |
  • Accessibility