Hello Brian! I agree with Gregory that this is a great idea that has potential, but perhaps not within the current education market. As a principal looking to reduce some expenses, it is more appealing to have prospective teachers conduct mock lessons (in summer school or extracurricular classes) as opposed to purchasing expensive VR equipment and paying monthly subscription fees. Is a monthly subscription fee necessary? How often do schools hire new teachers? You did mention that InnerVision VR can also recreate simulated environments such as parent-teacher conferences, collaborative staff meetings, etc. which is an attractive feature as these scenarios are functions of a teachers role and it may be beneficial to witness during the decision making process before hiring a new teacher. However, I’m not sure that these features alone would help me truly ensure that I’ve hired the best candidate for the job. I think if, as Jessica mentioned, the software can also be adapted for professional development then teachers can maintain ongoing training throughout the school year and the monthly subscription fee would make more sense. I can visualize the use and successful integration of this technology for hiring purposes (or otherwise) in certain industries in the future. For example, as VR becomes more affordable for low/middle income families and schools have already acquired VR technology for everyday/teaching purposes, InnerVisions VR could connect out of province/state/country candidates with hiring organizations for virtual interviews and or role-play in simulated environments like classrooms. Perhaps InnerVisions VR could consider a direction of producing the largest database of simulated environments/settings/scenarios for various industries for hiring/training/professional development purposes. Just a thought 🙂 Great job, I really enjoyed digging deeper into your venture.