Thank you again for your feedback! I think that you point out a great point @osayma with the issue of quality control. This is something that I looked at extensively. The LMS would support submissions to create information and resources for teachers and students a like. Any of the shared banks would be monitored and screened for quality assurance. This is outlined in the section that shows that you must email to receive either contracted or temporary positions as a contributor for the LMS. As the program grows, I would hope that the submission and the contracted positions would evolve to assist in a seamless process. In addition, with the acquisition of Jardin de Vicky, submissions and quality assurance would mirror their current practices that are already establish (the same as what I mention above). In its infancy, the system would follow this and then grow as the company does. Thanks again!