canada

I think you guys nailed the top application for this technique/technology other than student-facing uses: Pro-D. I was crafting a post about it and then there it was in the next section! (I'll share it anyway as I have a link to a cool study I think everyone would really dig) I think there’s a fantastic opportunity here in the realm of teacher professional development. According to this recent study https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-04482-001, when teachers were given evidence based literature to counter misconceptions they were found to accept the evidence only to revert to their old ways a short time later. >>>The evidence of this study points to a need for ongoing supportive interventions rather than one-and-done PD day workshops as is common here in Canada and elsewhere. Microlearning modules seem like an excellent platform to facilitate this for the reasons you’ve highlighted.<<< Some side notes: (1) “According to an ATD report, the average amount of time for an ideal microlearning module is 10 minutes.” - this was based on a poll where they asked people what they thought was best. This is not scientific in any sense and gives no indication of systematically finding the optimum of an efficacy curve, which I think deserves further study if it hasn't had already. (2) On "What makes “micro” micro? " Perhaps there is no time limit or minimum. The nature of microlearning might mean that the length of a module suits the content, context, or both. (3) Microlearning was initially introduced as stepwise, each step with goals toward a larger goal. But the science supposedly supporting microlearning was actually in support of REPETITION specifically. Not to say that the definition was wrong, per se, but this is a specific detail that should be emphasized and should inform microlearning module design >> Steps are not enough. Learners need iteration, which is one of the ideas behind the “spiral” model of learning. (This notion is conspicuously absent from the “4 defining characteristics”)<<

Feedback:  You really found put your thumb on a necessary problem, Derek! In Victoria, the unemployment rate in Victoria, BC was the lowest in Canada, as of December 2017, at 3.3% and the National average was only at 5.9%. My husband, who works in the trades industry, has a heck of a time finding people who are reliable and efficient. Every time his employee leaves, or must be let go, it can take over a year to find another suitable person. I like how your elevator pitch kept funneling us back to your website; should this become an actual venture, paying extra to remove the “weebly” would be a thought. I just checked GoDaddy and good news, “worktolearn.ca” is available! I am not a very fast reader, so I didn’t have enough time to read your slides on your elevator pitch. Putting your Twitter-brain into action would shorten up some of the phrases somewhat. You have clearly identified the problem: demand is vastly outweighing the supply of workers. The infographics and graphs are incredibly telling! The Work to Learn solution seems really great from an employer’s viewpoint. The incentives for students would need to be substantial, I would think, since there is such a high demand already. I think your Money section needs some more assurances for investors: what would the safeguards be that lawyers would draw up? Also, companies who invest in apprentices throughout their schooling, would need safeguards established. A system where students paid up-front but were reimbursed by their employer after a successful apprenticeship and minimum 1 year of employment. Future projections, a solid team and current competitors may wish to be elaborated for your pitch, as well. Your strengths here are the problem and the solution; with a little work, a stronger plan towards your solution would nail this venture! (pun intended)